Skip to main content

This may be 'bad news' for Chinese smartphone makers in India

A survey participated in by 50,000 people has revealed that a majority of Indians find their country's products more reliable than the ones imported from China.
.
.
"Is this product made in China," is the question many Indian consumers unfailingly ask the seller while buying most of the products nowadays.

.
.
Chinese products have made a way in almost every household. They might not be of the best quality but are cheaper than their Indian counterparts and provide value for money.
.
.

A survey conducted by LocalCircles revealed that for 52% citizens, Indian made items were generally better in quality than the Chinese ones; 21% said that Chinese-made items were better and 17% said both are more or less similar in quality.
.
.
.
Several cases of shutting down of many Indian small-scale industries have been reported over the years as they are not able to compete with the prices.
.
.
When asked what category of Chinese products citizens bought the most, the majority said they buy consumer durables like mobiles and other electronic items.
.
.
Another poll asked people why they bought a Chinese product. Around 33% said this was because they are the cheapest, 17% said that they are cheap and decent quality.
.
.
.
17% said Indian products have poor quality and higher prices whereas 33% said they buy Chinese products due to all the above-mentioned qualities.
.
.
Citizens were also questioned on what the best solution would be for quality concerns.
.
.
In response, 36% said that we should only allow the import of Chinese products with BIS standards and 33% said imports in hazardous and risk products category should not be allowed at all. 29% said compliance and audit at import points in India should be increased.
.
.
In various structured discussions, citizens also suggested that trade deficit with China could be reduced by putting anti-dumping duties for stopping the import of inferior quality products and defining proper standards according to which Chinese imports should be done.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#Facebook Video vs #YouTube Video find better one.

Live streams are now, mainstream. Live video has grown faster than most mediums, because it establishes a real-time connection and facilitates a conversation between the streamer and the audience. Nowadays, most social media platforms and video platforms allow you to stream live video. But, between the 2 major platforms, YouTube and Facebook, which one is actually the best for you to live stream to? On this blog post, we’ll talk about YouTube live vs. Facebook live. Here, you’ll find a side-by-side comparison between Facebook and YouTube, to help you decide where to focus your live streaming efforts as a brand or individual. Regardless of the platform, you prefer, keep in mind that they are the 2 biggest platforms out there. If you want to build an online audience, it’s wise to have an online presence on both. You can share different content on each of them, but for live streaming events and intricate live videos, you can and should go live on both platforms at the same time. This way,...

Thousands of Government Websites Hacked to Mine Cryptocurrencies

There was a time when hackers simply defaced websites to get attention, then they started hijacking them to spread banking trojan and ransomware, and now the trend has shifted towards injecting scripts into sites to mine cryptocurrencies. iPhone-X Styled ASUS Zenfone 5, Brings Along More Zenfone 5 Lite Renders Thousands of government websites around the world have been found infected with a specific script that secretly forces visitors' computers to mine cryptocurrency for attackers. Have you ever faced difficulty in transferring cash to a friend or relative The cryptocurrency mining script injection found on over 4,000 websites, including those belonging to UK's National Health Service (NHS), the Student Loan Company, and data protection watchdog Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), Queensland legislation, as well as the US government's court system. World’s tallest hotel Users who visited the hacked websites immediately had their computers...

CCI imposes Rs 135.86 crore penalty on Google for search bias

CCI noted in its order that undue intervention in product design can affect legitimate product improvements, given that design is an important dimension of competition. 4G smartphones at Rs 500, on a monthly plan of Rs 60 NEW DELHI|MUMBAI: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has imposed a ?136-crore fine on Google for "search bias" and abusing its "dominant position". The Indian competition regulator's ruling comes after similar setbacks in the European Union and Russia for the world's most popular search engine. An introduction to Progressive Web Apps In a 190-page order, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) said Google abused its dominant position on three counts that largely relate to search, while no foul play was seen in case of advertising. CCI imposed a penalty amounting to 5% of the average revenue generated from India over the three years to FY15, an amount of ?135.85 crore, which has to be deposited within 60 days. A ma...